Williams, JRG orcid.org/0000-0003-4831-2954 (2017) Indeterminate Oughts. Ethics, 127. pp. 645-673. ISSN 0014-1704
Abstract
Sometimes it is indeterminate what an agent morally ought do. This generates a Decision Ought Challenge — to give moral guidance to agents in such a scenario. This paper is a field guide to the options for a theory of the decision - ought for cases of indeterminacy. Three categories of view are evaluated, and the best representative for each is identified.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article | 
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: | 
 | 
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2017 by The University of Chicago. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. | 
| Dates: | 
 | 
| Institution: | The University of Leeds | 
| Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science (Leeds) > School of Philosophy (Leeds) | 
| Funding Information: | Funder Grant number EU - European Union 312938 | 
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications | 
| Date Deposited: | 09 Nov 2016 11:30 | 
| Last Modified: | 17 Mar 2018 01:39 | 
| Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1086/690071 | 
| Status: | Published | 
| Publisher: | University of Chicago Press | 
| Identification Number: | 10.1086/690071 | 
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:107198 | 

 CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
 CORE (COnnecting REpositories) CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
 CORE (COnnecting REpositories)