The successful development of cartilage repair treatments for the knee requires understanding of the biomechanical environment within the joint. Computational finite element models play an important role in non-invasively understanding knee mechanics, but it is important to compare model findings to experimental data. The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for generating subject-specific finite element models of porcine tibiofemoral joints that was robust and valid over multiple different constraint scenarios. Computational model predictions of two knees were compared to experimental studies on corresponding specimens loaded under several different constraint scenarios using a custom designed experimental rig, with variations made to the femoral flexion angle and level of tibial freedom. For both in vitro specimens, changing the femoral flexion angle had a marked effect on the contact distribution observed experimentally. With the tibia fixed, the majority of the contact region shifted to the medial plateau as flexion was increased. This did not occur when the tibia was free to displace and rotate in response to applied load. These trends in contact distribution across the medial and lateral plateaus were replicated in the computational models. In an additional model with the meniscus removed, contact pressures were elevated by a similar magnitude to the increase seen when the meniscus was removed experimentally. Overall, the models were able to capture specimen-specific trends in contact distribution under a variety of different loads, providing the potential to investigate subject-specific outcomes for knee interventions.
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)