Stoneham, T orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-4927 (2003) On equivocation. Philosophy. pp. 515-519. ISSN: 0031-8191
Abstract
I offer an analysis of equivocation which shows it not to be a fallacy. One who equivocates does not make a logical error but an epistemological one.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
| Keywords: | Equivocation Fallacy Logic |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of York |
| Academic Units: | The University of York > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (York) > Philosophy (York) |
| Depositing User: | Tom Stoneham |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Jun 2007 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Sep 2025 23:25 |
| Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819103000469 |
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Identification Number: | 10.1017/S0031819103000469 |
| Related URLs: | |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:2529 |

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)