Bryan, J. orcid.org/0000-0002-7979-6501, Ketley, A., Cavanagh, K. orcid.org/0000-0002-9863-1462 et al. (4 more authors) (2026) Second victim syndrome in surgeons: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of adverse events on surgeons. British Journal of Surgery, 113 (1). znaf258. ISSN: 0007-1323
Abstract
Background
Second victim syndrome (SVS) is characterized by negative psychological and psychosomatic effects on a healthcare provider after an adverse care event. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to characterize the symptoms of SVS experienced by surgeons and factors affecting their impact, as well as understand common coping strategies that surgeons employ to deal with them.
Methods
A systematic review of five electronic databases was conducted without restrictions on publication date or language in January 2025. Second victim syndrome, surgeon, and adverse event and their synonyms were used as search terms. Records were screened, quality assessed, and data extracted by two independent researchers. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were included and narratively synthesized. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to calculate the overall prevalence rates of symptoms and coping methods.
Results
A total of 36 papers were included in the analysis from 6629 retrieved records. Anxiety (56.3% (95% c.i. 45.8% to 66.3%)), guilt (53.8% (95% c.i. 41.3% to 65.8%)), sadness (48.3% (95% c.i. 34.6% to 62.3%)), and sleep disturbance (50.5% (95% c.i. 38.4% to 62.5%)) were the most commonly reported symptoms. Talking to either colleagues (72.5% (95% c.i. 65.6% to 78.4%)) or family/friends (52.0% (95% c.i. 40.6% to 63.2%)) were the most commonly employed coping strategies. The sex and level of experience of the surgeon and the severity of the event were identified as potential predictors of deleterious impact.
Conclusion
SVS significantly impacts surgeons’ global well-being, leading to burnout and attrition. Effective interventions require a multifaceted approach, including peer support, resilience training, and institutional changes that normalize emotional responses, encourage disclosure, and address barriers to seeking help. Targeted support for at-risk groups may also be necessary.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © The Author(s) 2026. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Keywords: | Humans; Surgeons; Adaptation, Psychological; Medical Errors; Syndrome |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
| Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Jan 2026 15:15 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Jan 2026 15:15 |
| Status: | Published |
| Publisher: | Oxford University Press (OUP) |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Identification Number: | 10.1093/bjs/znaf258 |
| Related URLs: | |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:236875 |

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)