Budworth, L. orcid.org/0000-0002-2905-6011, Wilson, B., Sutton-Klein, J. et al. (11 more authors) (2025) Is emergency doctors’ tolerance of clinical uncertainty on a novel measure associated with doctor well-being, healthcare resource use and patient outcomes? Emergency Medicine Journal, 42 (1). pp. 41-48. ISSN: 1472-0205
Abstract
Introduction Emergency doctors routinely face uncertainty—they work with limited patient information, under tight time constraints and receive minimal post-discharge feedback. While higher uncertainty tolerance (UT) among staff is linked with reduced resource use and improved well-being in various specialties, its impact in emergency settings is underexplored. We aimed to develop a UT measure and assess associations with doctor-related factors (eg, experience), patient outcomes (eg, reattendance) and resource use (eg, episode costs).
Methods From May 2021 to February 2022, emergency doctors (specialty trainee 3 and above) from five Yorkshire (UK) departments completed an online questionnaire. This included a novel UT measure—an adapted Physicians’ Reaction to Uncertainty scale collaboratively modified within our team according to Hillen et al’s (2017) UT model. The questionnaire also included well-being-related measures (eg, Brief Resilience Scale) and assessed factors like doctors’ seniority. Patient encounters involving prespecified ‘uncertainty-inducing’ problems (eg, headache) were analysed. Multilevel regression explored associations between doctor-level factors, resource use and patient outcomes.
Results 39 doctors were matched with 384 patients. The UT measure demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach’s α=0.92) and higher UT was significantly associated with better psychological well-being including greater resilience (Pearson’s r=0.56; 95% CI=0.30 to 0.74) and lower burnout (eg, Cohen’s d=−2.98; −4.62 to −1.33; mean UT difference for ‘no’ vs ‘moderate/high’ burnout). UT was not significantly associated with resource use (eg, episode costs: β=−0.07; −0.32 to 0.18) or patient outcomes including 30-day readmission (eg, OR=0.82; 0.28 to 2.35).
Conclusions We developed a reliable UT measure for emergency medicine. While higher UT was linked to doctor well-being, its impact on resource use and patient outcomes remains unclear. Further measure validation and additional research including intervention trials are necessary to confirm these findings and explore the implications of UT in emergency practice.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Leeds |
| Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Psychology (Leeds) The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Institute of Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM) (Leeds) |
| Funding Information: | Funder Grant number NIHR National Inst Health Research M24387 NIHR National Inst Health Research R&D ARC M20086 |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Nov 2025 11:08 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Nov 2025 11:08 |
| Status: | Published |
| Publisher: | BMJ |
| Identification Number: | 10.1136/emermed-2023-213256 |
| Related URLs: | |
| Sustainable Development Goals: | |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:234144 |
Download
Filename: 41.full.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0


CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)