Objectives: To compare the cost-effectiveness of collagenase injection (collagenase) and limited fasciectomy (LF) surgery in treating moderate Dupuytren’s contracture (DC) in the UK over different time horizons. Methods: An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel randomised controlled trial (DISC), to determine the short-term cost-effectiveness of collagenase compared to LF. A Markov decision analytic model was developed to assess long-term cost-effectiveness. Results: Collagenase was associated with significantly lower cost and insignificantly lower Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain compared to LF at one year. The probability of collagenase being cost-effective was over 99% at willingness-to-pay thresholds of £20,000–£30,000 per QALY. At two years, collagenase was both significantly less costly and less effective compared to LF, and LF became cost-effective above a threshold of £25,488. There was a high level of uncertainty surrounding the 2-year results. Over a lifetime horizon, collagenase generated a cost saving of £2,968 per patient, but was associated with a mean QALY loss of -0.484. The probability of collagenase being cost-effective dropped to 22% and 16% at £20,000–£30,000 per QALY, respectively. Conclusions: Collagenase was less costly and less effective than LF in treating DC. The cost-effectiveness of collagenase compared to LF was time-dependent. Collagenase was highly cost-effective one-year post-treatment, but the probability of collagenase being cost-effective declined over time. The Markov model suggested that LF is more cost-effective over a lifetime horizon. These findings emphasise the importance of longer follow-up when comparing surgical and nonsurgical interventions to fully capture overall costs and benefits. Keywords: Dupuytren’s contracture, Collagenase clostridium histolyticum, limited fasciectomy, cost-effectiveness, Markov model
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)