Condie, J. orcid.org/0009-0005-1991-1706, Franklin, M. orcid.org/0000-0002-2774-9439, Doorn, K.A.-V. et al. (10 more authors) (2025) Statistical and health economic analysis plan for a secure care hospital evaluation of manualised (interpersonal) art-psychotherapy: the SCHEMA randomized controlled trial. Trials, 26. 227. ISSN 1468-6708
Abstract
Background
The SCHEMA trial evaluates whether interpersonal art psychotherapy reduces the frequency/severity of aggressive incidents or patient distress associated with psychiatric symptoms, compared to usual care.
Objective
To describe the statistical and health economic analysis plan.
Methods
A multicentre, two-arm, parallel-group, single blind individually randomised controlled trial with 150 adults within NHS secure care who have borderline to mild/moderate intellectual disability. The primary outcome is the frequency/severity of aggressive behaviour, measured on the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) 19 weeks post-randomisation, analysed using a linear mixed-effect model, adjusted for baseline MOAS and stratification by gender and psychosis diagnosis. Changes in aggressive behaviour will be evaluated using weekly MOAS scores between 19 and 38 weeks. Patient distress relating to psychiatric symptoms will be assessed using the Brief Symptom Inventory Positive Symptom Distress Index across baseline, 19, and 38 weeks. Health-related quality-of-life will be assessed using self- and proxy-reported EQ-5D three-level (EQ-5D-3L) and Recovering Quality of Life 10-item measures, the latter to estimate the ReQoL Utility Index, across baseline, 19, and 38 weeks. The self-reported EQ-5D-3L is collected using an adapted version for people with intellectual disabilities. Resource-use is collected based on secure care records, to estimate intervention and healthcare costs over 19 and 38 weeks. HRQoL and cost data will inform cost-effectiveness based on the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year over 38 weeks.
Discussion
This paper details the planned analyses and discusses recruitment challenges, sample size implications, and effect size assumptions. The plan was developed prior to database lock and unblinding to minimise analytical bias.
Trial registration
ISRCTN, ISRCTN57406593. Registered on 18/01/2023.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © The Author(s) 2025. Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
Keywords: | Secure care; Intellectual disability; MOAS; Aggression; Art-psychotherapy |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health |
Funding Information: | Funder Grant number DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE NIHR301264 |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 07 Jul 2025 15:28 |
Last Modified: | 07 Jul 2025 15:28 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1186/s13063-025-08934-3 |
Sustainable Development Goals: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:228815 |