Robinson-Barella, A. orcid.org/0000-0002-9523-4760, Richardson, C.L., Bayley, Z. orcid.org/0000-0001-7890-8682 et al. (11 more authors) (2025) ‘Do I actually even need all these tablets?’ A qualitative study exploring deprescribing decision-making for people in receipt of palliative care and their family members. Palliative Medicine, 39 (5). pp. 543-552. ISSN 0269-2163
Abstract
Background: For people in receipt of palliative care, where polypharmacy is common and medication burden is high, there remains limited knowledge around the decision-making processes that underpin deprescribing; for example, recent deprescribing studies have focused on wider issues of identifying polypharmacy in palliative care contexts. However, little is known about the specific challenges of, and preferences towards, decision-making to support the deprescribing for people in receipt of palliative care.
Aim: To explore decision-making processes that underpin deprescribing approaches, based on the experiences of people in receipt of palliative care, and their family member(s).
Design: An explorative qualitative study involving in-person semi-structured interviews, analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Setting/participants: Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with people in receipt of palliative care (n = 25), where 12 of these interviews were undertaken as dyads, with both the patient and a family member together. Interviews were undertaken across a range of settings, spanning: hospice outpatient day units (n = 11), hospice inpatient wards (n = 4), care home (n = 1) and patients’ own homes (n = 9), and involved people with diverse diagnoses (including: cancer 52%, heart failure 20%, motor neurone disease 12%, pulmonary fibrosis 4% and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 4%).
Results: Two overarching themes were developed – the first reflected the need to address patient understanding by ‘laying the foundations of deprescribing decision-making’. The second theme, ‘having a voice in deprescribing decision-making’, reflected desires to (pro)-actively involve patients and their family member(s) within these processes.
Conclusion: There is a need to take a balanced, person-centred and shared approach to deprescribing decision-making for people receiving palliative care. Co-design strategies offer one approach to further explore this.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages. |
Keywords: | Humans; Polypharmacy; Palliative Care; Family; Decision Making; Qualitative Research; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Middle Aged; Female; Male; Interviews as Topic; Deprescriptions |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Social Sciences (Sheffield) > Faculty of Social Sciences Research Institute |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 14 May 2025 10:38 |
Last Modified: | 14 May 2025 10:38 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1177/02692163251327900 |
Related URLs: | |
Sustainable Development Goals: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:226656 |