Lindsay, J.O. orcid.org/0000-0003-3353-9590, Hind, D. orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-4793, Swaby, L. orcid.org/0000-0001-9443-7681 et al. (30 more authors) (2024) Autologous stem cell transplantation with low-dose cyclophosphamide to improve mucosal healing in adults with refractory Crohn’s disease: the ASTIClite RCT. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation, 11 (3). ISSN 2050-4365
Abstract
Some text in this abstract has been reproduced from Lindsay J, Din S, Hawkey C, Hind D, Irving P, Lobo A, et al. OFR-9 An RCT of autologous stem-cell transplantation in treatment refractory Crohn’s disease (low-intensity therapy evaluation): ASTIClite. Gut 2021;70(Suppl. 4):A4.
Background Treatment-refractory Crohn’s disease is characterised by chronic symptoms, poor quality of life and high costs to the NHS, and through days of work lost by patients. A previous trial of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) failed its end point of medication-free clinical remission for 3 months with no evidence of disease activity, and reported high toxicity. Subsequent studies suggest that HSCT achieves complete mucosal healing in 50% of patients, and that toxicity likely relates to the cyclophosphamide dose.
Objectives The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of HSCTlite (HSCT with low-dose cyclophosphamide) compared with standard care for inducing regression of intestinal ulceration in patients with refractory Crohn’s disease at week 48. Secondary objectives included the assessment of disease activity, quality of life and regimen safety. Mechanistic objectives included immune reconstitution after HSCTlite.
Design Two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with a 2 : 1 (intervention : control) allocation ratio.
Setting Nine NHS trusts (eight trusts were recruitment sites; one trust was a treatment-only site).
Participants Adults with treatment-refractory Crohn’s disease, for whom surgery was inappropriate or who had declined surgery.
Interventions The intervention treatment was HSCTlite using cyclophosphamide, and the control was any current available treatment for Crohn’s disease, apart from stem cell transplantation.
Main outcomes The primary outcome was treatment success at week 48 [mucosal healing (Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease ulcer subscore of 0) without surgery or death], assessed by central readers blinded to allocation and timing of assessment. Key secondary outcomes were clinical remission, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease scores at week 48, change in Crohn’s Disease Activity Index scores and safety.
Results The trial was halted owing to Suspected unexpected serious adverse events that took place after randomising 23 patients (HSCTlite arm, n = 13; usual-care arm, n = 10). Ten out of the 13 patients randomised to the HSCTlite arm received the intervention and nine (one death) reached the 48-week follow-up. In the usual-care arm 9 out of the 10 patients randomised reached the 48-week follow-up (one ineligible). The primary outcome was available for 7 out of 10 HSCTlite patients (including the patient who died) and six out of nine usual-care patients. Absence of endoscopic ulceration without surgery or death was reported in three out of seven (43%) HSCTlite patients, compared with zero out of six (0%) usual-care patients. Centrally read Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease scores [mean (standard deviation)] were 10.8 (6.3) and 10.0 (6.1) at baseline, compared with 2.8 (2.9) and 18.7 (9.1) at week 48, in the HSCT and usual-care arms, respectively. Clinical remission (Crohn’s Disease Activity Index scores of < 150) occurred in 57% and 17% of patients in the HSCTlite and usual-care arms, respectively, at week 48. Serious adverse events were more frequent in the HSCTlite arm [38 in 13 (100%) patients] than in the usual-care arm [16 in 4 (40%) patients]. Nine suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions were reported in six HSCTlite patients, including three cases of delayed renal failure due to proven thrombotic microangiopathy. Two HSCTlite patients died.
Conclusions Within the limitations of reduced patient recruitment and numbers of patients assessed, HSCTlite meaningfully reduced endoscopic disease activity, with three patients experiencing resolution of ulceration. Suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions, particularly relating to thrombotic microangiopathy, make this regimen unsuitable for future clinical use.
Limitations The early trial closure prevented complete recruitment, and the impact of the coronavirus pandemic prevented completion of some study investigations. Small participant numbers meant analysis could only be descriptive.
Future work Owing to undetermined aetiology of thrombotic microangiopathy, further trials of HSCTlite in this population are not considered appropriate. Priorities should be to determine optimal treatment strategies for patients with refractory Crohn’s disease, including those with a stoma or multiple previous resections.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2024 Lindsay et al. This work was produced by Lindsay et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. For attribution the title, original author(s), the publication source – NIHR Journals Library, and the DOI of the publication must be cited. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 22 Mar 2024 12:19 |
Last Modified: | 22 Mar 2024 12:19 |
Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/cglt7102 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | National Institute for Health and Care Research |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.3310/cglt7102 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:210756 |