
There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.
Ratto, F, Breeze, TD, Cole, LJ et al. (13 more authors) (2022) Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision-making. Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. ISSN 0888-8892
Abstract
Pollinator declines have prompted efforts to assess how land-use change affects insect pollinators and pollination services in agricultural landscapes. Yet many tools to measure insect pollination services, require substantial landscape-scale data and technical expertise. In expert workshops, 3 straightforward methods (desk-based method, field survey, and empirical manipulation with exclusion experiments) for rapid insect pollination assessment at site scale were developed to provide an adaptable framework that is accessible to nonspecialist with limited resources. These methods were designed for TESSA (Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-Based Assessment) and allow comparative assessment of pollination services at a site of conservation interest and in its most plausible alternative state (e.g., converted to agricultural land). We applied the methods at a nature reserve in the United Kingdom to estimate the value of insect pollination services provided by the reserve. The economic value of pollination services provided by the reserve ranged from US$6,163 to US$11,546 year<sup>-1</sup> . The conversion of the reserve to arable land would provide no insect pollination services and a net annual benefit from insect-pollinated crop production of approximately $1,542 year<sup>-1</sup> (US$24 ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup> ). The methods had wide applicability and were readily adapted to different insect-pollinated crops: rape (Brassica napus) and beans (Vicia faba) crops. All methods were rapidly employed under a low budget. The relatively less robust methods that required fewer resources yielded higher estimates of annual insect pollination benefit. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Ratto, F., Breeze, T.D., Cole, L.J., Garratt, M.P.D., Kleijn, D., Kunin, B., Michez, D., O'Connor, R., Ollerton, J., Paxton, R.J., Poppy, G.M., Potts, S.G., Senapathi, D., Shaw, R., Dicks, L.V. and Peh, K.S.-H. (2022), Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision-making. Conservation Biology. Accepted Author Manuscript., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13886. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited. |
Keywords: | dependency ratio; ecosystem services; exclusion experiment; field beans; insect pollinators; oilseed rape; TESSA; visitation frequency |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Biological Sciences (Leeds) > School of Biology (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 14 Feb 2022 14:56 |
Last Modified: | 05 Mar 2024 17:23 |
Status: | Published online |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Identification Number: | 10.1111/cobi.13886 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:183505 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision-making. (deposited 14 Feb 2022 14:56) [Currently Displayed]