Byerly, T.R. (2017) The indirect response to the foreknowledge argument. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 9 (4). pp. 3-12. ISSN 1689-8311
Abstract
This paper develops an indirect response to arguments for theological fatalism of the sort defended in John Martin Fischer's Our Fate: Essays on God and Free Will. The presentation is intentionally crafted in such a way as to engage directly with several key aspects of Fischer's work, though it should be of more general interest. New details of the indirect response are supplied, and the dialectical value of the response is addressed.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2017 European Journal for Philosophy of Religion. This is an author-produced version of a paper subsequently published in EJPR. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (Sheffield) > Department of Philosophy (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jul 2018 10:05 |
Last Modified: | 18 Feb 2021 10:29 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v9i4.2024 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | European Journal for Philosophy of Religion |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.24204/EJPR.V9I4.2024 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:133710 |