Elstein, D (2007) Against Sonderholm: still committed to expressivism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 107 (1). 111 - 116. ISSN 0066-7374
Abstract
Jorn Sonderholm (2005) has argued that Simon Blackburn's commitment semantics for evaluative discourse is unable to explain the validity of simple inferences involving disjunction. This is true insofar as the basic rules which Blackburn suggests are not strong enough, but it is relatively simple to augment those rules so as to meet Sonderholm's challenge, whilst respecting the spirit of commitment semantics. One way of doing this is to add a reduction rule such that if accepting p commits one to inconsistent commitments, one is committed to accepting ¬p. Thus Sonderholm has not provided any reason to doubt the adequacy of commitment semantics to explain validity in evaluative discourse.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | This is the accepted version of the following article:Elstein, D (2007) Against Sonderholm: still committed to expressivism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 107 (1). 111 - 116 , which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2007.00213.x |
Keywords: | Expressivism; sonderholm |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of Humanities (Leeds) > School of Theology & Religious Studies (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 25 Sep 2014 15:41 |
Last Modified: | 28 Jan 2018 03:48 |
Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2007.00213.x |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Blackwell Publishers Ltd. |
Identification Number: | 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2007.00213.x |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:80323 |