Gordon, L.E., San Nicolas, R. and Provis, J.L. orcid.org/0000-0003-3372-8922 (2014) Chemical characterisation of metakaolin and fly ash based geopolymers during exposure to solvents used in carbon capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control , 27. pp. 255-266. ISSN 1750-5836
Abstract
This paper presents an investigation into the chemical resistance of blended alkali activated aluminosilicate materials, specifically under exposure to two solvents used in post-combustion carbon capture, monoethanolamine (MEA) and potassium carbonate, as well as during immersion in distilled water. Geopolymers are formulated based on metakaolin and aon fly ash as aluminosilicate precursors, with the addition of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) as a source of Ca. The samples are subjected to mineralogical and chemical characterisation in this paper, with data obtained through leaching analysis and X-ray diffraction, supported by compressive strength data. Exposure to solvents generally results in significant alteration of the geopolymer microstructure. The zeolitic phases formed in undamaged metakaolin-based binders are reduced to undetectable levels after 28 days of solvent exposure, although the hydrosodalite formed in the fly ash binders does persist. Leaching analysis indicates that resistance to structural damage in MEA is quite high, due to the low solubility of Na and hydroxides upon immersion. KCO solutions are aggressive towards geopolymers via alteration of the binder structure and dissolution of network-forming species (Si and Al), leading to the loss of binder strength. This is most marked in the fly ash/GGBFS formulations. Despite the low to intermediate level of Ca present in these geopolymer binders, significant formation of Ca-containing carbonate phases occurs upon exposure to KCO. The limited curing duration of the specimens tested here is certainly contributing to the degradation taking place under KCO exposure, whereas the low water activity in the MEA solutions used means that bond hydrolysis in the aluminosilicate geopolymer framework is restricted, and the materials perform much better than in a more water-rich environment. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2016 Elsevier. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control . Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Article available under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
Keywords: | Construction materials; Process equipment; Concrete, Geopolymer; Solvent processes |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Engineering (Sheffield) > Department of Materials Science and Engineering (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 15 Sep 2016 14:23 |
Last Modified: | 29 Mar 2018 12:09 |
Published Version: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.06.005 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.06.005 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:79827 |
Download
Filename: Gordon et al. IJGGC 2014 as accepted.pdf
Licence: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0