Stoneham, T orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-4927 (2003) On equivocation. Philosophy. pp. 515-519. ISSN 0031-8191
Abstract
I offer an analysis of equivocation which shows it not to be a fallacy. One who equivocates does not make a logical error but an epistemological one.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Keywords: | Equivocation Fallacy Logic |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of York |
Academic Units: | The University of York > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (York) > Philosophy (York) |
Depositing User: | Tom Stoneham |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jun 2007 |
Last Modified: | 25 Jan 2025 00:04 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819103000469 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1017/S0031819103000469 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:2529 |