Lang, G. (2025) Starting and Stopping Wars. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 106 (2). pp. 96-106. ISSN: 0279-0750
Abstract
If a warring side may fight in pursuit of an aim up to some proportionality-respecting limit, then an important question is whether that side is morally required to stop fighting when it reaches that limit, despite not yet having attained its aim. The ‘Quota View’ answers this question affirmatively, while other views hold that the fighting may continue just as long as the projected future losses fall within certain limits. I criticize some of these other views, as well as a further argument that can be distilled from these sources, and advance a qualified version of the Quota View.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Leeds |
| Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science (Leeds) |
| Date Deposited: | 27 May 2026 12:49 |
| Last Modified: | 27 May 2026 12:49 |
| Status: | Published |
| Publisher: | Wiley |
| Identification Number: | 10.1111/papq.12479 |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:241243 |
Download
Filename: Pacific Philosophical Qtr - 2025 - Lang - Starting and Stopping Wars (1).pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)