Field, B. orcid.org/0000-0003-3502-2691, Smith, K.E., Wickramasekera, N. orcid.org/0000-0002-6552-5153 et al. (1 more author) (2026) Why object to inequalities in health and wellbeing? A mixed-methods exploration of inequality aversion with members of the general public. Value in Health. ISSN: 1098-3015
Abstract
Distributional cost-effectiveness analyses (DCEAs) help decision-makers incorporate equity considerations in healthcare resource allocation. Public aversion to health inequalities is well documented, but underlying reasonings are rarely explored. Existing studies often elicit inequality aversion across socioeconomic groups, potentially conflating aversion to inequalities in health with inequalities in household finances or wellbeing. Additionally, online surveys systematically exclude people who do not use the internet, a disadvantaged group.
Objectives
To examine whether: i) reasoning for distributional preferences depend on the domain of inequality; ii) reasoning for distributional preferences are affected by cause of inequality; iii) participants provide and explain responses that violate ‘monotonicity’ (the welfare economics principle that, other things being equal, social welfare improves when at least one person is better-off); and iv) the above vary across the digital divide.
Methods
We employed mixed-methods to collect qualitative and quantitative data, via online discussion groups with a survey (11 groups, n=53), and telephone interviews (n=15) with digital minority individuals. Participants considered scenarios comparing equal and unequal health and wellbeing outcomes for an imaginary island. Wellbeing was framed as ‘equivalent income’ (described to participants as household spending money, with other life aspects being good).
Results
Distributional preferences varied by domain and cause of inequality but not digital status. Health inequality caused by financial inequality was widely unaccepted. Some preferred equal distributions, even when violating ‘monotonicity’, citing fairness and social cohesion.
Conclusions
Recruiting across the digital divide and using mixed-methods enriches inequality aversion research, enhancing the inclusivity and legitimacy of DCEA.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2026 The Authors. Except as otherwise noted, this author-accepted version of a journal article published in Value in Health is made available via the University of Sheffield Research Publications and Copyright Policy under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| Keywords: | Mixed-methods; digital divide; health and wellbeing; inequality aversion; online discussion groups; social preferences; telephone interviews |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
| Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Social Sciences (Sheffield) > School of Economics (Sheffield) The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health |
| Date Deposited: | 16 Mar 2026 16:51 |
| Last Modified: | 16 Mar 2026 16:51 |
| Status: | Published online |
| Publisher: | Elsevier BV |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.jval.2026.01.029 |
| Related URLs: | |
| Sustainable Development Goals: | |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:239191 |
Downloads
Filename: ViHaccepted_forwhiterose6.2_BF.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0
Filename: Fig1exampleoftasksresubmissionViH.jpg
Licence: CC-BY 4.0
Filename: Fig2Summarysurveytelintresponses.jpg
Licence: CC-BY 4.0
Filename: Table_1.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0
Filename: Table_2.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0
Filename: Table_3.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0


CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)