Moran, V., Moore, S.G. orcid.org/0000-0002-0249-8645 and Ho, P. orcid.org/0000-0002-2533-0183 (2025) Ultra-Processed Foods and Dietetic Practice: Findings From a Survey and Focus Group With UK Dietitians. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 38 (1). e70029. ISSN 0952-3871
Abstract
Background Food processing converts fresh food into products and is of interest to nutrition professionals including dietitians given emerging evidence linking consumption of 'ultra-processed' products with health.
Objective To explore dietitians' professional practice around the topic of processed foods and health, including their perceptions of individual food products.
Methods An online survey was developed to evaluate professional involvement, confidence and views using a 5-point scale (i.e., 1 = never, 5 = daily). Respondents' perceptions of three products were also obtained, including level of processing (LoP) (from 1 = unprocessed to 5 = ultra-processed) and recommended frequency of consumption (FoC) (from 1 = avoid to 5 = several times/day). Eligible survey respondents (UK dietitians) were recruited via the British Dietetic Association and social media. Data were analysed descriptively. A focus group was held with five dietitians to discuss current practice around this topic. Verbal data were thematically analysed.
Results Survey respondents (n = 366) possessed an average of 13 ± 9.8 years practising across various specialisms. Most discussed (82%) and provided guidance on (77%) processed foods and health monthly or more frequently, with 'high' levels of confidence (61%–59%), and agreed that healthy diets may include processed (94%) or 'highly/ultra' processed (71%) foods. Perceptions of each individual food product varied, yet the largest proportion of respondents selected LoP and FoC options for Tinned tomatoes: 'minimally processed' (54%), 'several times/week' (69%); mycoprotein mince: 'highly/ultra-processed' (57%), 'several times/month' (40%); and wholemeal bread: 'processed' (46%), 'several times/week' (58%). Focus group themes included uncertainties in definitions of ultra-processed and negative consumer perceptions around processing.
Conclusion This first survey of UK dietitians on processed foods suggests that dietetic practice frequently involves this topic and that views on the role of these foods in healthy diets are varied. Respondents also possessed a range of perceptions on the LoP of individual products, and further work is now warranted to support future development for dietetic practice.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0). |
Keywords: | dietitians, health, nutrition, processed foods, professional practice, ultra-processed foods (UPF) |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > School of Food Science and Nutrition (Leeds) > FSN Colloids and Food Processing (Leeds) The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > School of Food Science and Nutrition (Leeds) > FSN Chemistry and Biochemistry (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 14 Feb 2025 09:47 |
Last Modified: | 14 Feb 2025 09:47 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Identification Number: | 10.1111/jhn.70029 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:223346 |