Neither ‘underpinning’ nor ‘overarching’: explicating a critically reciprocal philosophy of religious studies

Burley, M. orcid.org/0000-0002-7446-3564 (2024) Neither ‘underpinning’ nor ‘overarching’: explicating a critically reciprocal philosophy of religious studies. Religion, 54 (4). pp. 689-705. ISSN 0048-721X

Abstract

Metadata

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information:

© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords: critical description, interdisciplinarity‌, Timothy Knepper, Bernard Lonergan, philosophy of religion, religious studies, Kevin Schilbrack, thick description‌
Dates:
  • Published: October 2024
  • Published (online): 9 August 2024
  • Accepted: 2 June 2024
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science (Leeds) > Theology and Religious Studies (Leeds)
Depositing User: Symplectic Publications
Date Deposited: 04 Jun 2024 15:04
Last Modified: 04 Dec 2024 15:53
Status: Published
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Identification Number: 10.1080/0048721X.2024.2388435
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID):

Export

Statistics