Beebee, H orcid.org/0000-0001-7650-3622 (2002) Reply to Huemer on the consequence argument. The Philosophical Review, 111 (2). pp. 235-241. ISSN 0031-8108
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | This article is under copyright. This is an author produced version of an article published in The Philosophical Review. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science (Leeds) > School of Philosophy (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 03 Jan 2023 15:23 |
Last Modified: | 04 Jan 2023 09:56 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Duke University Press |
Identification Number: | 10.1215/00318108-111-2-235 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:184497 |