Beebee, H orcid.org/0000-0001-7650-3622 (2013) David hume: Objects and Power. In: Debates in Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings and Contemporary Responses. Routledge , New York , pp. 242-252. ISBN : 9780415887977
Abstract
A central feature of Galen Strawson's argument is an analogy between David Hume's attitude to Causation and his attitude to external objects. This chapter includes some doubt on Strawson's claim that the second thesis that philosophers' ordinary causal talk refers to Causation despite its being 'unintelligible' to philosophers––has historical precedents in the work of Locke and George Berkeley. The chapter argues that Causation––but not belief in external objects––is similarly cognitively idle for Hume. Strawson likens Hume's position on causation to Locke's position with respect to real essences. Pace Strawson, the fact that Hume "does not make positive claims about what definitely does not exist" is not "enough to refute any attribution of all that causation actually is, in the objects, is regular succession to him". Locke's commitment to real essences plays no role in his account of the legitimate use of substance names, and, as philosophers have seen, this is precisely because real essences are unintelligible.
Metadata
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science (Leeds) > School of Philosophy (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 02 Aug 2023 12:23 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 12:23 |
Published Version: | https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.432... |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Routledge |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:183990 |