Bradley, D (2021) Uniqueness and Modesty: How Permissivists can live on the edge. Mind, 130 (520). pp. 1087-1098. ISSN 0026-4423
Abstract
There is a divide in epistemology between those who think that, for any hypothesis and set of total evidence, there is a unique rational credence in that hypothesis (Uniqueness), and those who think that there can be many rational credences (Permissivism). Schultheis (2018) offers a novel and potentially devastating objection to Permissivism, on the grounds that Permissivism permits dominated credences. I will argue that Permissivists can plausibly block Schultheis argument. The issue turns on getting clear about whether we should be certain whether our credences are rational.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © Bradley 2020. This is an author produced version of an article, published in Mind. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science (Leeds) > School of Philosophy (Leeds) |
Funding Information: | Funder Grant number British Academy MD19\190046 |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 09 Sep 2020 12:53 |
Last Modified: | 08 Oct 2023 00:13 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
Identification Number: | 10.1093/mind/fzaa036 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:165235 |