Keiser, J (2020) The Limits of Acceptance. Inquiry. ISSN 0020-174X
Abstract
In ‘Lying and Insincerity’, Andreas Stokke argues for the superiority of the Stalnakerian account of lying on the basis of its ability to accommodate the intuition that bald-faced lies are genuine lies. In this paper I question this and other predictions of the Stalnakerian account, arguing that they hinge crucially on how we sharpen our understanding of two technical terms: assertion and official common ground. I survey a number of potential precisifications, arguing that none provide a clear and non-circular metric for verifying the predictions at issue. Because the options I consider are not exhaustive, it is possible for Stalnakerian theorists to provide a robust metric for testing the theory in controversial cases. My aim is to put pressure on them to do so, and to show that – until then – the Stalnakerian approach has no clear advantage over the Gricean approach.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an author produced version of an article published inAn Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Keywords: | Assertion; bald-faced lies; Stalnaker; Grice; common ground |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jan 2020 10:16 |
Last Modified: | 13 Mar 2023 09:15 |
Status: | Published online |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
Identification Number: | 10.1080/0020174X.2020.1775380 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:155529 |