Perisanidi, M orcid.org/0000-0002-7077-8497 (2017) Was There a Marital Debt in Byzantium? The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 68 (3). pp. 510-528. ISSN 0022-0469
Abstract
According to Western canonists, husband and wife had a debt towards one another: they were obliged to render sexual intercourse on demand. This article looks at the differences and similarities of the ‘marital debt’ in Byzantium and the West in order to evaluate whether this concept can be applied to Byzantine couples. It argues that, contrary to the West, in Byzantium there was no fixed linguistic terminology or sophisticated rules to describe a sexual obligation between spouses. Ultimately, there was also less need for one as sexual intercourse within marriage was not considered sinful and needed no justification.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | (c) 2017, Cambridge University Press. This article has been published in a revised form in the Journal of Ecclesiastical History [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022046916002840]. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of History (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 03 Jul 2017 16:41 |
Last Modified: | 20 Jan 2018 02:10 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
Identification Number: | 10.1017/S0022046916002840 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:118508 |