Bradley, DJ (2015) Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Wilson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66 (3). pp. 683-693. ISSN 0007-0882
Abstract
In Bradley ([2011b]), I offered an analysis of Sleeping Beauty and the Everettian interpretation of quantum mechanics (EQM). I argued that one can avoid a kind of easy confirmation of EQM by paying attention to observation selection effects, that halfers are right about Sleeping Beauty, and that thirders cannot avoid easy confirmation for the truth of EQM. Wilson ([forthcoming]) agrees with my analysis of observation selection effects in EQM, but goes on to, first, defend Elga’s ([2000]) thirder argument on Sleeping Beauty and, second, argue that the analogy I draw between Sleeping Beauty and EQM fails. I will argue that neither point succeeds.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Cultures (Leeds) > School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science (Leeds) > School of Philosophy (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 06 Jan 2017 16:13 |
Last Modified: | 06 Jan 2017 16:13 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axt042 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
Identification Number: | 10.1093/bjps/axt042 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:110241 |