Cameron, R.W. orcid.org/0000-0002-7786-0581 and Blanusa, T. (2016) Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services – Is the Devil in the Detail? Annals of Botany. ISSN 0305-7364
Abstract
Background - Green infrastructure is a strategic network of green spaces designed to deliver ecosystem services to human communities. Green infrastructure is a convenient concept for urban policy makers, but the term is used too generically and with limited understanding of the relative values or benefits of different types of green space and how these complement one another. At a finer scale/more practical level– little consideration is given to the composition of the plant-community, yet this is what ultimately defines type and level of service provision. This paper calls for greater attention to be paid to urban plantings with respect to their ecosystem service delivery and for plant science to engage more-fully in identifying those plants that promote various services. Scope - Many urban plantings are still designed with aesthetics as the paramount service criterion, with limited thought on how plant choice/composition provides other ecosystem services. Research is beginning to demonstrate, however, that landscape plants provide a range of important services, such as helping mitigate floods and alleviate heat island effects, but that not all species are equally effective. The paper reviews a number of important services and demonstrates how genotype choice can radically affect the extent of service delivery. Conclusions – Although the research is in its infancy, data is being generated that relates plant traits to specific services; thereby helping identify genotypes that optimise service delivery. The urban environment, however, will become exceedingly bland if future planting is simply restricted to monocultures of a few ‘functional’ genotypes. Therefore, further information is required on how to design entire plant communities where the plants identified:- a/ provide more than a single benefit (multi-functionality) b/ complement each other in terms of maximising the range of benefits that can be delivered in one location and c/ continue to maintain public acceptance through diversity.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2016 Oxford University Press. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in Annals of Botany. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Keywords: | Alien plants; biodiversity; building energy efficiency; carbon sequestration; ecosystem services; green infrastructure; human health and well-being; policy; pollution; storm-water management; temperature regulation; urban |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Social Sciences (Sheffield) > Department of Landscape Architecture (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 04 Aug 2016 09:20 |
Last Modified: | 21 Jan 2020 12:18 |
Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw129 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy B - Oxford Open Option A |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1093/aob/mcw129 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:102682 |