Sensitivity of quantitative myocardial dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to saturation pulse efficiency, noise and t(1) measurement error: Comparison of nonlinearity correction methods

Broadbent, DA, Biglands, JD orcid.org/0000-0002-1161-5022, Ripley, DP et al. (4 more authors) (2016) Sensitivity of quantitative myocardial dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to saturation pulse efficiency, noise and t(1) measurement error: Comparison of nonlinearity correction methods. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 75 (3). pp. 1290-1300. ISSN 0740-3194

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2016, Wiley. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: "Broadbent, D. A., Biglands, J. D., Ripley, D. P., Higgins, D. M., Greenwood, J. P., Plein, S. and Buckley, D. L. (2016), Sensitivity of quantitative myocardial dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to saturation pulse efficiency, noise and t1 measurement error: Comparison of nonlinearity correction methods. Magn. Reson. Med., 75: 1290–1300" which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25726. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
Keywords: cardiovascular magnetic resonance; perfusion; myocardial blood flow; simulation; quantification; nonlinearity correction
Dates:
  • Accepted: 20 March 2015
  • Published (online): 6 May 2015
  • Published: March 2016
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health and Therapeutics (LIGHT) > Academic Unit of Medical Physics (Leeds)
Depositing User: Symplectic Publications
Date Deposited: 18 Aug 2016 11:53
Last Modified: 04 Nov 2016 07:06
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25726
Status: Published
Publisher: Wiley
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25726
Related URLs:

Share / Export

Statistics