Items where authors include "Pickard, A.S."

Article

Kuharić, M., Pickard, A.S., Mukuria, C. orcid.org/0000-0003-4318-1481 et al. (1 more author) (2024) The measurement properties of the EQ-HWB and the EQ-HWB-S in Italian population: a comparative study with EQ-5D-5L. Value in Health, 27 (7). pp. 955-966. ISSN 1098-3015

Feng, Y.-S. orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-3409, Kohlmann, T., Peasgood, T. et al. (3 more authors) (2024) Scoring the EQ-HWB-S: can we do it without value sets? A non-parametric item response theory analysis. Quality of Life Research, 33 (5). pp. 1211-1222. ISSN 0962-9343

King, M.T. orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-2887, Revicki, D.A. orcid.org/0000-0001-6780-0019, Norman, R. orcid.org/0000-0002-3112-3893 et al. (27 more authors) (2024) United States Value Set for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Eight Dimensions (FACT-8D), a Cancer-Specific Preference-Based Quality of Life Instrument. PharmacoEconomics - Open, 8 (1). pp. 49-63. ISSN 2509-4262

King, M.T. orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-2887, Revicki, D.A. orcid.org/0000-0001-6780-0019, Norman, R. orcid.org/0000-0002-3112-3893 et al. (27 more authors) (2024) United States value set for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general eight dimensions (FACT-8D), a cancer-specific preference-based quality of life instrument. PharmacoEconomics - Open, 8 (1). pp. 49-63. ISSN 2509-4262

Peasgood, T., Mukuria, C. orcid.org/0000-0003-4318-1481, Brazier, J. orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-4780 et al. (14 more authors) (2022) Developing a new generic health and wellbeing measure: psychometric survey results for the EQ-HWB. Value in Health, 25 (4). pp. 525-533. ISSN 1098-3015

Brazier, J. orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-4780, Peasgood, T., Mukuria, C. orcid.org/0000-0003-4318-1481 et al. (24 more authors) (2022) The EQ-HWB: overview of the development of a measure of health and wellbeing and key results. Value in Health, 25 (4). pp. 482-491. ISSN 1098-3015

Shah, K.K. orcid.org/0000-0002-4927-7858, Bennett, B., Lenny, A. et al. (5 more authors) (2021) Adapting preference-based utility measures to capture the impact of cancer treatment-related symptoms. The European Journal of Health Economics, 22 (8). pp. 1301-1309. ISSN 1618-7598

Brazier, J. orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-4780, Ara, R., Azzabi, I. et al. (8 more authors) (2019) Identification, review, and use of health state utilities in cost-effectiveness models: An ISPOR good practices for outcomes research task force report. Value in Health, 22 (3). pp. 267-275. ISSN 1098-3015

Devlin, N., Brazier, J. orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-4780, Pickard, A.S. et al. (1 more author) (2018) 3L, 5L, What the L? A NICE Conundrum. Pharmacoeconomics, 36 (6). pp. 637-640. ISSN 1170-7690

King, M.T., Viney, R., Pickard, A.S. et al. (13 more authors) (2018) Australian utility weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30. PharmacoEconomics, 36 (2). pp. 225-238. ISSN 1170-7690

Norman, R., Viney, R., Aaronson, N.K. et al. (12 more authors) (2017) Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format. Quality of Life Research, 26 (8). pp. 2247-2248. ISSN 0962-9343

Krabbe, P.F.M., Devlin, N.J., Stolk, E.A. et al. (6 more authors) (2014) Multinational Evidence of the Applicability and Robustness of Discrete Choice Modeling for Deriving EQ-5D-5L Health-State Values. Medical Care, 52 (11). pp. 935-943. ISSN 0025-7079