Chappell, Richard Yetter orcid.org/0000-0003-3322-4935 and Yetter-Chappell, Helen orcid.org/0000-0003-3527-5306 (2016) Virtue and Salience. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. pp. 449-463. ISSN 1471-6828
Abstract
Abstract: This paper explores two ways in which evaluations of an agent's character as virtuous or vicious are properly influenced by what the agent finds salient or attention-grabbing. First, we argue that ignoring salient needs reveals a greater deficit of benevolent motivation in the agent, and hence renders the agent more blameworthy. We use this fact to help explain our ordinary intuition that failing to give to famine relief (for example) is in some sense less bad than failing to help a child who is drowning right before your eyes, in a way that's compatible with the contention that there's no principled reason to see the one life-saving act as any more or less choiceworthy than the other. Second, we argue that alleged ‘virtues of ignorance’ (modesty, believing better of friends than the evidence supports, etc.) are better understood as ‘virtues of salience’. Rather than placing demands on what we believe, these virtues place demands on what we find salient.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2015 Australasian Association of Philosophy. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Australasian Journal of Philosophy. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Keywords: | attention,benevolence,friendship,modesty,salience,virtue |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of York |
Academic Units: | The University of York > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (York) > Philosophy (York) |
Depositing User: | Pure (York) |
Date Deposited: | 13 Jan 2016 16:30 |
Last Modified: | 23 Oct 2024 00:00 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2015.1115530 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1080/00048402.2015.1115530 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:90869 |