Leech, J. (2015) The Varieties of (Relative) Modality. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. ISSN 0279-0750
Abstract
In 'The Varieties of Necessity' Fine presents purported counterexamples to the view that a proposition is a naturally necessary truth if and only if it is logically necessary relative to or conditional upon the basic truths about the status and distribution of natural kinds, properties and relations. The aim of this article is to defend the view that natural necessity is relative necessity, and the general idea that we can define other kinds of necessity as relative, against Fine's criticisms.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2015 The Author. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly © 2015 University of Southern California and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (Sheffield) > Department of Philosophy (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 08 Oct 2015 09:22 |
Last Modified: | 30 Aug 2017 16:11 |
Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papq.12086 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1111/papq.12086 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:90265 |