Clarke, DJ, Tyson, S, Rodgers, H et al. (8 more authors) (2015) Why do stroke patients not receive the recommended amount of active therapy (ReAcT)? Study protocol for a multi-site case study investigation. BMJ Open, 5 (8). e008443. ISSN 2044-6055
Abstract
Introduction: Increased frequency and intensity of inpatient therapy contributes to improved outcomes for stroke-survivors. Differences exist in the amount of therapy provided internationally. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland it is recommended that a minimum of forty-five minutes of each active therapy should be provided at least five days a week provided the therapy is appropriate and that the patient can tolerate this. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (2014) data demonstrate this standard is not being achieved for most patients. No research been undertaken to explore how therapists in England manage their practice to meet time-specific therapy recommendations. The ReAcT study aims to develop an in-depth understanding of stroke therapy provision, including how the guideline of forty-five minutes a day of each relevant therapy, is interpreted and implemented by therapists, and how it is experienced by stroke-survivors and their families. Methods and analysis: A multi-site ethnographic case-study design in a minimum of six stroke units will include modified process mapping, observations of service organisation, therapy delivery, and documentary analysis. Semi-structured interviews with therapists and service managers (n= 90), and with patients and informal carers (n=60 pairs) will be conducted. Data will be analysed using the Framework approach.. Ethics and dissemination: The study received a favourable ethical opinion via the National Research Ethics Service (reference number: 14/NW/0266). Participants will provide written informed consent or, where stroke-survivors lack capacity, a consultee declaration will be sought. ReAcT is designed to generate insights into the organisational, professional, social, practical and patient related factors acting as facilitators or barriers to providing the recommended amount of therapy. Provisional recommendations will be debated in consensus meetings with stakeholders who have not participated in ReAcT case-studies or interviews. Final recommendations will be disseminated to therapists, service managers, clinical guideline developers and policy makers, and stroke-survivors and informal carers.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: | This paper has 11 authors. You can scroll the list below to see them all or them all.
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2015, The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Leeds Institute of Health Sciences (Leeds) > Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation (Leeds) |
Funding Information: | Funder Grant number National Inst for Health Research (NIHR) PB-PG-0213-30019 |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 28 Sep 2015 13:32 |
Last Modified: | 12 Feb 2019 14:15 |
Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008443 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | BMJ Publishing Group |
Identification Number: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008443 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:89624 |