McCormack, G orcid.org/0000-0002-1574-1296 (2016) US exceptionalism and UK localism? Cross-Border Insolvency Law in Comparative Perspective. Legal Studies, 36 (1). pp. 136-162. ISSN 0261-3875
Abstract
This article addresses how the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency has been implemented and interpreted in the US and UK. The Model Law has attained a measure of international acceptance and is intended to achieve greater efficiencies in the administration of insolvency cases with transnational dimensions. But different manners of implementation in different countries and differing interpretations may hinder the prospects for harmonization and coordination of laws. The paper will address in particular whether US interpretations differ from those in the UK and whether the US decisions are so infused with ‘American exceptionalism’ that they cannot be relied upon as sure guides in other countries.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2015 The Society of Legal Scholars. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: McCormack, G. (2016) US exceptionalism and UK localism? Cross-border insolvency law in comparative perspective. Legal Studies, 36: 136–162. doi: 10.1111/lest.12096, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lest.12096. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jun 2015 12:20 |
Last Modified: | 13 Apr 2021 12:20 |
Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lest.12096 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Identification Number: | 10.1111/lest.12096 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:87076 |