Stern, R.A. (2014) ‘Divine Commands and Secular Demands: On Darwall on Anscombe on “Modern Moral Philosophy”. Mind, 123 (492). 1095 - 1122. ISSN 0026-4423
Abstract
This paper considers Stephen Darwall’s recent attempt to overturn Elizabeth Anscombe’s claim that moral obligation only really makes sense in terms of a divine command account, where he argues that in fact this account must give way to a more secularized and humanistic position if it is to avoid incoherence. It is suggested that Darwall’s attempt to establish this is flawed, and thus that his internal critique of divine command ethics fails.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2014 Stern. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in Mind. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (Sheffield) > Department of Philosophy (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jan 2015 15:40 |
Last Modified: | 25 Mar 2018 23:47 |
Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzu145 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press (OUP) |
Refereed: | No |
Identification Number: | 10.1093/mind/fzu145 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:82930 |