Hall, CM and Upham, PJ (2015) Denying bogus skepticism in climate change and tourism research. Tourism Management, 47. 352 - 356. ISSN 0261-5177
Abstract
This final response to the two climate change denial papers by Shani and Arad further highlights the inaccuracies, misinformation and errors in their commentaries. The obfuscation of scientific research and the consensus on anthropogenic climate change may have significant long-term negative consequences for better understanding the implications of climate change and climate policy for tourism and create confusion and delay in developing and implementing tourism sector responses.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2015. Elsevier. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Tourist Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Tourist Management, 47,(2015) DOI10.1016/j.tourman.2014.08.009 |
Keywords: | Climate change; global warming; skepticism; denial; agnotology |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Engineering & Physical Sciences (Leeds) > School of Chemical & Process Engineering (Leeds) > Energy Research Institute (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 05 Feb 2015 16:57 |
Last Modified: | 15 Jan 2018 23:29 |
Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.08.009 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.08.009 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:82794 |