Atwell, ES (2008) Development of tag sets for part-of-speech tagging. In: Ludeling, A and Kyto, M, (eds.) Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Volume 1. Walter de Gruyter , 501 - 526. ISBN 978-3-11-021142-9
Abstract
This article discusses tag sets used when PoS-tagging a corpus, that is, enriching a corpus by adding a part-of-speech tag to each word. This requires a tag-set, a list of grammatical category labels; a tagging scheme, practical definitions of each tag or label, showing words and contexts where each tag applies; and a tagger, a program for assigning a tag to each word in the corpus, implementing the tag-set and tagging-scheme in a tag-assignment algorithm. We start by reviewing tag-sets developed for English corpora in section 1, since English was the first language studied by corpus linguists. Pioneering corpus linguists thought that their English corpora could be more useful research resources if each word was annotated with a Part-of-Speech label or tag. Traditional English grammars generally provide 8 basic parts of speech, derived from Latin grammar. However, most tag-set developers wanted to capture finer grammatical distinctions, leading to larger tag-sets. PoS-tagged English corpora have been used in a wide range of applications. Section 2 examines criteria used in development of English corpus Part-of-Speech tag sets: mnemonic tag names; underlying linguistic theory; classification by form or function; analysis of idiosyncratic words; categorization problems; tokenisation issues: defining what counts as a word; multi-word lexical items; target user and/or application; availability and/or adaptability of tagger software; adherence to standards; variations in genre, register, or type of language; and degree of delicacy of the tag-set. To illustrate these issues, section 3 outlines a range of examples of tag set developments for different languages, and discusses how these criteria apply. First we consider tag-sets for an online Part-of-Speech tagging service for English; then design of a tag-set for another language from the same broad Indo-European language family, Urdu; then for a non-Indo-European language with a highly inflexional grammar, Arabic; then for a contrasting non-Indo-European language with isolating grammar, Malay. Finally, we present some conclusions in section 4, and references in section 5.
Metadata
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Editors: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | (c) 2008, Walter de Gruyter. Reproduced with permission from the publisher. |
Keywords: | Corpus linguistics; computational linguistics |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Engineering & Physical Sciences (Leeds) > School of Computing (Leeds) > Artificial Intelligence & Biological Systems (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 05 Dec 2014 10:59 |
Last Modified: | 20 Apr 2015 13:58 |
Published Version: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/product/19320 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Walter de Gruyter |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:81781 |