Stern, R. (2006) Metaphysical Dogmatism, Humean Scepticism, Kantian Criticism. Kantian Review, 11 (1). 102 - 116. ISSN 1369-4154
Abstract
In this article, I want to argue that scepticism for Kant must be seen in ancient and not just modern terms, and that if we take this into account we will need to take a different view of Kant's response to Hume from the one that is standardly presented in the literature. This standard view has been put forward recently by Paul Guyer, and it is therefore his view that I want to look at in some detail, and to try to correct.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2006 Cambridge University Press. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in Kantian Review. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (Sheffield) > Department of Philosophy (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 03 Nov 2014 10:08 |
Last Modified: | 08 Nov 2014 10:31 |
Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1369415400002260 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1017/S1369415400002260 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:81348 |