Stevely, A.K. orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-5245, Wilson, L.B. orcid.org/0000-0001-5769-5729, Angus, C. orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4135 et al. (4 more authors) (2026) Are alcohol‐free and low‐alcohol drinks more expensive than regular‐strength drinks? A descriptive analysis of sales data from Great Britain, 2024. Addiction. ISSN: 0965-2140
Abstract
Background and aims
Alcohol-free and low alcohol [no/lo; ≤1.2% alcohol by volume (ABV)] drinks are increasingly popular in some high-income countries and offer potential public health benefits if used as substitutes for regular-strength drinks; however, perceived high prices may deter people from buying these products. This paper explored whether no/lo drinks are more expensive than regular-strength drinks. We compared for no/lo and regular-strength drinks: (i) average prices and price distributions; (ii) prices of products matched on brand and pack size; and (iii) average prices across different multipack sizes, container sizes and container types (e.g. bottle vs. can).
Design
Cross-sectional analysis of population-level, off-trade (i.e. shops) sales data.
Setting
Great Britain, 2024.
Cases
N = 21 147 no/lo and regular-strength stock-keeping units (SKUs, e.g. 6x300ml Heineken 0.0).
Measurements
We analysed data from the market research company Circana. Analyses were stratified by beverage categories: beer, cider, wine, spirits and ready-to-drinks (RTDs). Our primary measures were median prices of all products available and median purchase prices (i.e. weighted by sales volume). Prices were per standard serving size for each beverage type. We used quantile regression to test differences in median prices.
Findings
In 2024, the median price of no/lo drinks available was lower than for regular-strength drinks (ranging from beer −19% to wine −44%; P < 0.001), except for RTDs (11% higher; P = 0.390). In contrast, the purchase price of no/lo drinks was 7% higher for beer (P < 0.001), similar for cider (0.4% difference; P < 0.001) and lower for wine (−47%; P < 0.001), spirits (−10%; P < 0.001) and RTDs (−31%; P < 0.001). Top-selling no/lo products were cheaper than matched regular-strength products of the same brand and pack size. For example, 15 of the 17 top-selling no/lo beers were between 6% and 42% cheaper than their regular-strength equivalents; however, the top-selling no/lo products were primarily premium brands, and no/lo beers and ciders were typically sold in smaller, less cost-efficient pack and container sizes.
Conclusions
In Great Britain, the alcohol-free and low alcohol (no/lo) products available to buy in the off-trade (i.e. in shops) are cheaper on average than regular-strength drinks, but people still tend to pay more for no/lo beer than regular-strength beer and pay a similar price for no/lo cider as regular-strength cider. This discrepancy is partially because no/lo beers and ciders are often sold in smaller, less cost-efficient pack and container sizes. The premium branding of top-selling no/lo products may also contribute to higher prices.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2026 The Author(s). Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
| Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health |
| Funding Information: | Funder Grant number DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE UNSPECIFIED NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre NIHR135310 |
| Date Deposited: | 03 Sep 2026 13:43 |
| Last Modified: | 03 Sep 2026 13:43 |
| Status: | Published online |
| Publisher: | Wiley |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Identification Number: | 10.1111/add.70568 |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:245072 |

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)