Jayes, M. orcid.org/0000-0002-0371-7811, Baines, K. orcid.org/0009-0004-2269-6878, Beech, P. orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-656X et al. (4 more authors) (2026) Validation and fidelity testing of a screening tool to identify patients’ communication needs during mental capacity assessments: the Mental Capacity Assessment Support Toolkit Communication Screening Tool (MCAST CST). Clinical Rehabilitation. ISSN: 0269-2155
Abstract
Objective To establish the validity, reliability and fidelity of use of a screening tool for stroke survivors’ communication support needs during mental capacity assessments. Design Cross-sectional psychometric study and multiple methods case series. Setting Participants’ homes and stroke units in north-west England. Participants Psychometrics: 47 community-dwelling stroke survivors; 10 speech and language therapists experienced in stroke. Fidelity: four nurses and one occupational therapist working in stroke; eight inpatients diagnosed with stroke. Main measures Psychometrics: Stroke survivors were tested using the new communication screening tool and subtests from the Western Aphasia Battery Revised and Comprehensive Aphasia Test to measure convergent and discriminant validity, test-retest and interrater reliability. Data were analysed using Kendall's Tau, Goodman-Kruskal's Gamma and Cohen's Kappa. Fidelity The nurses and occupational therapist were videorecorded using the screening tool with inpatients. An observational checklist and semi-structured interviews were used to investigate adherence to predefined administration behaviours. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. Results Psychometrics: Screening tool subtests demonstrated moderate-to-strong convergent validity (τ = 0.41–0.72) but poor discriminant validity (τ = 0.27–0.58). Criterion validity was strong (κ = 0.77, 95%CI 0.57–0.98). Test-retest reliability ranged from substantial to near-perfect (κ = 0.68–0.95). Interrater agreement ranged from substantial to perfect (κ = 0.65–1.00). Fidelity Participants adhered to a mean of 85.79% (SD = 10.33) administration behaviours. User errors related to task instruction delivery and scoring. All participants found the tool easy to use and useful. Conclusions This unique screening tool for stroke survivors’ communication support needs during mental capacity assessments is valid and reliable. Minor refinements to administration training will improve fidelity of use.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2026 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Keywords: | Stroke; aphasia; assessment; communication difficulties; decision making |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
| Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health |
| Date Deposited: | 13 Jul 2026 10:53 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Jul 2026 10:53 |
| Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155261453603 |
| Status: | Published online |
| Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Identification Number: | 10.1177/02692155261453603 |
| Related URLs: | |
| Sustainable Development Goals: | |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:243043 |


CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)