Pham, M., Craig, B.M. orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-1316, Peasgood, T. orcid.org/0000-0001-8024-7801 et al. (1 more author) (2026) A direct comparison of the measurement properties of the PROMIS-16 and EQ-5D-5L in the U.S. general population. Quality of Life Research, 35 (6). 137. ISSN: 0962-9343
Abstract
Objectives Introduced in 2024, the PROMIS®-16 is a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument that measures eight dimensions: physical function, ability to participate in social roles and activities, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, pain interference, cognitive function, and fatigue. Given the potential overlap in dimensions, this study compares the measurement and psychometric properties of the PROMIS-16 and EQ-5D-5L.
Methods In 2024, an online cross-sectional survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults aged 18 years or older (N = 2577), including the EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-16 as stand-alone instruments. We compared the measurement properties of the PROMIS-16 and the EQ-5D-5L, namely ceiling and floor percentages, informativity (Shannon’s indices), and convergent/divergent validity. Furthermore, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis to identify their combined structure.
Results Within construct-overlapping items, the PROMIS-16 items exhibited greater dispersion, including lower ceiling percentages and higher informativity, compared to their EQ-5D-5L counterparts. Good convergent validity between PROMIS-16 and EQ-5D-5L items was observed for physical functioning (mobility; r = 0.85) and anxiety/depression (r = 0.76–0.79). EFA captured six distinct constructs: Physical Function, Social Roles & Activities, Anxiety / Depression, Pain Interference, Cognitive Function, and Sleep / Fatigue. Possibly due to reverse coding, the two Cognitive Function items of PROMIS-16 showed inconsistent performance, with weak correlations and limited alignment with other constructs.
Conclusions The PROMIS-16 items demonstrated greater conceptual coverage and informativity than the EQ-5D-5L, but issues with inconsistent framing and potential response biases remained. On the other hand, the EQ-5D-5L demonstrated stronger concordance with respondents’ global health assessments compared to the PROMIS-16.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2026 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Keywords: | Comparable outcome; EQ-5D-5L; Health-related quality of life; PROMIS; Humans; Quality of Life; Psychometrics; United States; Female; Cross-Sectional Studies; Adult; Middle Aged; Surveys and Questionnaires; Male; Reproducibility of Results; Aged; Health Status; Adolescent; Young Adult; Anxiety |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
| Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health |
| Date Deposited: | 10 Jul 2026 14:42 |
| Last Modified: | 10 Jul 2026 14:42 |
| Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-026-04242-8 |
| Status: | Published |
| Publisher: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Identification Number: | 10.1007/s11136-026-04242-8 |
| Related URLs: | |
| Sustainable Development Goals: | |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:243020 |
Download
Filename: s11136-026-04242-8.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0


CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)