Powerless or Powerful? Healthcare Professionals' Construction of Agency in Patient and Family Engagement Accounts

Background Patient safety incidents cause substantial harm globally, with affected patients and families often experiencing additional ‘compounded harm’ from inadequate organisational responses. Despite policy imperatives emphasising engagement as essential for safety improvement, significant gaps persist in the National Health Service (NHS), where involvement in Serious Incident (SI) investigations is often overlooked or treated as a p2assive process. While previous qualitative research has primarily used thematic analysis, discourse analytic approaches can offer deeper insights into nuanced patterns of meaning.

Design/Objective We conducted discourse analysis on 49 semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals across six NHS Trusts to examine how staff construct agency in their accounts of engaging patients and families in SI investigations and how these discourses are linked to the broader organisational context.

Results Findings illustrate two prevailing but contested discourses: one depicting staff engagement with patients and families as inconsistent and limited, and the other emphasising their integral role in the investigation process. Interviewees framed themselves as either powerless or powerful, aligning with these respective discourses, while organisational factors, such as professional roles and work relationships, also influenced those constructions.

Discussion A focus on the linguistic construction of agency, control and responsibility provides a powerful lens for understanding persistent gaps in patient and family engagement and highlights the value of incorporating discourse analytic approaches into health policy development and implementation.

Patient or Public Contribution A Citizens' Panel (n = 16) was involved throughout the broader research programme, ensuring public accountability; supporting wider discussions about the emergent findings of the research and their implications for fairness, equality, diversity and inclusion; and supporting the dissemination of findings in creative and accessible ways.