Calder, N.D.M. orcid.org/0009-0005-8701-7968, Kaloyirou, F., Griffiths, J. et al. (14 more authors) (2026) Randomised multiple centre trial of conservative versus liberal fluid administration for children receiving a kidney transplant (LIMITS): clinical trial protocol. BMJ Open, 16. e119384. ISSN: 2044-6055
Abstract
Introduction In current practice, fluid volumes administered to children following kidney transplant vary widely. Up to 52% of children experience fluid overload-related complications. Current fluid guidelines are not evidence-based and the optimal amount of fluid for children after transplant is not known. The aim of Randomised multiple centre trial of conservative versus LIberal fluid adMInisTration for children receiving a kidney tranSplant (LIMITS) is to determine whether relative limitation of fluid volume administered to children receiving kidney transplants is superior to liberal fluid volume administration.
Methods and analysis LIMITS is a pragmatic, open-label, UK-based, multicentre randomised controlled trial, with an internal pilot phase and integrated economic evaluation. A total of 140 children receiving kidney transplants will be randomised to receive either conservative postoperative fluid administration (maximum of 150 mL/m2/hour for no longer than 18 hours, followed by a fixed daily target of maximum 1.5 L/m2/day thereafter) versus the comparator of liberal postoperative fluid administration (fluid volume administered to replace urine output and insensible losses for at least 48 hours with target urine output >2 mL/kg/hour). The primary outcome is mean days at home in the first 30 days after kidney transplant. The primary outcome will be analysed using a mixed linear regression model adjusted for donor type (living vs deceased donor) and participant weight (<20 kg and ≥20 kg pretransplant) as fixed effects and transplant centre as a random effect. Cost-effectiveness will also be evaluated.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2026 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
| Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health |
| Date Deposited: | 16 Jun 2026 10:29 |
| Last Modified: | 16 Jun 2026 10:29 |
| Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119384 |
| Status: | Published |
| Publisher: | BMJ |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Identification Number: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119384 |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:242103 |
Download
Filename: e119384.full.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)