Awoloto, O., Bekker, H.L. orcid.org/0000-0003-1978-5795, Alphonsus, C. et al. (5 more authors) (2026) Patient Beliefs and Experiences of Adhering to Medical Therapies for Cardiovascular Comorbidities, Before Noncardiac Elective Surgery in South Africa: A Mixed-Methods Study. Anesthesia and Analgesia. ISSN: 0003-2999
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular comorbidities increase perioperative risk in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Optimizing medication adherence in this population is critical; yet adherence remains low in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where health beliefs, systemic barriers, and healthcare communication bring significant challenges. This study aimed to explore the acceptability of validated patient-reported questionnaires and to investigate the beliefs and experiences influencing adherence to cardiovascular medication before surgery in a South African tertiary hospital.
METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted using semistructured interviews with 21 patients taking cardiovascular medication before vascular surgery. Participants completed four validated self-report questionnaires: Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), SHARED decision-making questionnaire, and SURE decisional conflict scale. Questionnaire responses were summarized with descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis of interview data was conducted using Braun and Clarke’s six-step framework.
RESULTS: Most participants perceived their illness as chronic (15/20, 75%) and their treatment as effective (18/21, 86%), yet 15 of 21 (71%) reported high concern and 9 of 21 (43%) reported emotional distress. Belief in the need for medication was strong (21/21, 100%), but 14 of 21 (67%) worried about long-term side effects and 10 of 21 (47%) described their medication as a “mystery.” Shared decision-making appeared limited: only 7 of 21 (33%) recalled being asked for their views. Thematic analysis revealed seven major themes: understanding illness and treatment, health professional interactions, service access, social support, individual factors, routines, and habits.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported tools were acceptable and highlighted complex, interrelated factors associated with adherence. Integrating these tools into preoperative care may help identify at-risk patients and support person-centered perioperative planning in LMICs.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2026 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Leeds |
| Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) |
| Date Deposited: | 14 May 2026 15:09 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Aug 2026 09:15 |
| Status: | Published online |
| Publisher: | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
| Identification Number: | 10.1213/ANE.0000000000008110 |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:241083 |
Downloads
Filename: Survey Patient Beliefs about Adherence before elective surgery_ZA_Wani_March2026 (1).pdf
Filename: patient-beliefs-and-experiences-of-adhering-to-medical.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)