Chen, H. orcid.org/0009-0008-2734-1784, Di Gregorio, M. orcid.org/0000-0003-2545-217X and Paavola, J. orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-466X (2026) Carbon leakage in emissions trading systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-ante and ex-post evidence. Climate Policy. ISSN: 1469-3062
Abstract
Emissions Trading Systems (ETSs) are a widely adopted policy tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, emission reductions achieved within ETSs can be partially offset by increases in emissions elsewhere , a phenomenon known as carbon leakage. This paper systematically reviews the global literature on carbon leakage associated with ETSs through a combined quantitative meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis. Findings show that ex-ante modelling studies generally report positive carbon leakage rates, with estimates varying widely across schemes. Leakage rates are typically lower when more of the global emissions are covered, anti-leakage measures are included, and when using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. Ex-post studies find leakage through channels such as interstate electricity trade in the U.S. and investment relocation in the EU ETS and China pilot ETSs. Findings on goods trade and carbon transfer within firms are mixed. These findings highlight the differences in results between ex-ante and ex-post studies, the heterogeneity of leakage outcomes across schemes, and the critical role of country-specific context in designing ETSs and associated anti-leakage measures.
Key policy insights The systematic review finds that ex-ante studies estimate a lower leakage rate when emissions coverage is broader, anti-leakage measures are included, and computable general equilibrium models are used.
Ex-post studies evidence leakage through specific channels including investment leakage in the EU ETS and Chinese pilot ETSs, and coal-to-gas substitution in the U.S. regional ETSs.
Jurisdictions designing a mitigation policy should account for context-specific leakage risks when evaluating alternative policy instruments. Further ex-ante evidence on leakage is needed for emerging ETSs beyond the major schemes.
To comprehensively address carbon leakage, a broader, integrated policy mix incorporating both demand- and supply- side anti-leakage measures, enhanced international cooperation, and sector-specific supports is recommended.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
| Keywords: | Emissions trading system; cap and trade; carbon leakage; carbon pricing; systematic review |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Leeds |
| Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > School of Earth and Environment (Leeds) |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Feb 2026 11:04 |
| Last Modified: | 18 Feb 2026 11:04 |
| Status: | Published online |
| Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
| Identification Number: | 10.1080/14693062.2026.2627750 |
| Related URLs: | |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:237953 |

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)