Booth, A. orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-3880 and Fryer, K. (2026) Qualitative evidence synthesis. In: Facey, K.M., Holtorf, A.-P. and Single, A.N.V., (eds.) Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment. Health Informatics. Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 177-194. ISBN: 9783032112835. ISSN: 1431-1917. EISSN: 2197-3741.
Abstract
Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) offers a method for presenting patients’ attitudes, beliefs, and experiences from multiple qualitative studies. It is used in health technology assessments (HTAs) to understand diverse patient perspectives alongside quantitative evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness. QES methods include meta-aggregation, thematic synthesis, meta-ethnography, and framework synthesis. Factors like research question, available resources, expertise, and data types guide the choice of QES method. QES involves formulating the review question, literature searching, quality assessment, analysis, and synthesis. Dissemination considers the intended audience and purpose. Approaches to integrate qualitative and quantitative data include using mixed-methods synthesis methodologies, conceptual frameworks, or logic models. QES is growing rapidly due to increased recognition of decision-making complexities and the role of patient-clinician interactions in technology effectiveness. Limitations include quality of primary study reporting and interpretive nature. Innovations like GRADE-CERQual offer opportunities for incorporating synthesised patient perspectives in HTAs and decision-making.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Book Section |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Editors: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2026 The Author(s). Open Access: This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. |
| Keywords: | Patient perspectives; Health technology assessment; Systematic review methods; Patient experience data |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
| Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health |
| Date Deposited: | 13 Feb 2026 16:38 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Feb 2026 16:38 |
| Status: | Published |
| Publisher: | Springer Nature Switzerland |
| Series Name: | Health Informatics |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Identification Number: | 10.1007/978-3-032-11284-2_11 |
| Sustainable Development Goals: | |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:237807 |
Download
Filename: 978-3-032-11284-2_11.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0


CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)