Murphy, J., Stevens, C., Roberts, A.L. et al. (4 more authors) (2025) ‘I think it depends how it’s done’: a qualitative study of screening attendees’ perspectives on receiving physical activity advice within UK NHS cancer screening programmes. BMJ Open, 15 (11). e099416. ISSN: 2044-6055
Abstract
Objectives Cancer screening appointments are an opportunity to encourage positive behavioural changes. Up to 80% of cancer screening attendees are open to discussing physical activity during cancer screening, but some say this would deter them from future screening. This study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of individuals’ receptivity to physical activity advice at cancer screening.
Design Interview-based qualitative study.
Setting and participants The study was conducted from May 2017 to September 2018 in the UK. Participants were recruited using adverts on two university campuses, Facebook and a participant recruitment agency. To be eligible, participants had to have an upcoming cancer screening appointment within 2 weeks. There were 30 participants.
Procedures Participants recorded their receptivity to physical activity advice in the days before and after screening. Data-prompted semi-structured interviews explored these responses. Interviews were analysed using a thematic framework analysis.
Results Participants felt discussing physical activity at cancer screening would be relevant. However, participants experienced anxiety related to the screening process which could increase or decrease their receptivity. Participants felt if information was delivered in a judgemental way, it could negatively impact future screening participation.
Conclusions Screening attendees’ receptivity could be influenced by the timing of a discussion and by their levels of anxiety throughout screening. Participants’ anxiety during screening can either reduce their ability to engage in a discussion or increase the relevance of the discussion. The communication style of the healthcare practitioner was key for why some screening attendees could be deterred from future cancer screening.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Keywords: | Oncology; Qualitative research; Mass Screening |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Leeds |
| Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Jan 2026 16:35 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Jan 2026 16:35 |
| Status: | Published |
| Publisher: | BMJ |
| Identification Number: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099416 |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:236141 |

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)