Gibbs, Naomi Kate orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-8082, Chen, Tao orcid.org/0000-0002-5489-6450, Malik, Abid et al. (8 more authors) (2025) Cost-effectiveness of a technology-assisted peer-delivered perinatal mental health intervention in Pakistan:an economic evaluation using trial evidence. BMJ Global health. ISSN: 2059-7908
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Perinatal depression in low- and middle-income countries is a global health concern. Interventions to support women suffering from perinatal depression using mental health specialists, such as the WHO Thinking Healthy Programme (WHO-THP), are established but may not be scalable in resource-constrained settings. The technology-assisted peer-delivered THP (THP-TAP) has been developed as a potential solution to deliver an intervention at scale. This study assesses whether the THP-TAP is cost-effective compared with the WHO-THP in Pakistan. METHOD: Using data for 980 pregnant women from a cluster-randomised non-inferiority trial in Pakistan, we conducted a within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of THP-TAP compared with WHO-THP. Health outcomes are quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and costs in US$ (2022). Costs collected included intervention delivery costs and wider healthcare resource use costs. The trial intervention delivery costs were adapted to 'real-world' intervention delivery costs using evidence and assumptions. Uncertainty was explored through scenario and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: During the trial, the mean patient QALYs were 0.683 (0.681, 0.685) for WHO-THP and 0.688 (0.686, 0.690) for THP-TAP, resulting in an incremental increase in QALYs of 0.005 (0.002, 0.008). The mean per patient costs were $279 ($268, $290) for WHO-THP and $227 for THP-TAP ($218, $236), resulting in an incremental cost of -$52 (-67, -$38). The per patient delivery costs were estimated at $44 and $24 in the real-world scenario, whereas in the trial they were $59 and $69, for WHO-THP and THP-TAP, respectively.THP-TAP is both more effective and less costly than WHO-THP. These results were robust when considering parameter uncertainty and across various scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that THP-TAP could represent a scalable, health-improving and cost-saving intervention to support those with perinatal depression, when compared with WHO-THP.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group. |
| Keywords: | Humans,Pakistan,Cost-Benefit Analysis,Female,Pregnancy,Peer Group,Quality-Adjusted Life Years,Adult,Depression/therapy,Perinatal Care/economics,Pregnancy Complications/therapy |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of York |
| Academic Units: | The University of York > Faculty of Social Sciences (York) > Centre for Health Economics (York) |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Nov 2025 14:50 |
| Last Modified: | 17 Nov 2025 14:50 |
| Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020833 |
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Identification Number: | 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020833 |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:234582 |

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)