Bugeja, R., Athey, R. orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-176X and Jha, S. orcid.org/0000-0002-4519-6903 (2025) Patient decision aids for pelvic floor surgery and impact on decisional conflict. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. ISSN: 1470-0328
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate whether the use of a patient decision aid (PDA) diminishes decision conflict in patients considering surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to assess patient satisfaction concerning the PDA's user-friendliness and overall utility.
Design
One hundred women attending routine urogynaecology clinic appointments were offered the PDA as part of standard care and recruited into the study. After using the PDA, participants completed a decisional conflict scale (DCS) to assess their decision-making experience.
Setting
Single-site NHS tertiary-level care hospital outpatient department.
Population and Sample
The study included women considering surgical management for uterine/vault prolapse or SUI. Exclusion criteria comprised individuals under 18 years of age, those unable to communicate in English and patients not eligible for all surgical options presented in the PDAs.
Methods
Patients presenting to the urogynaecology clinic with symptomatic SUI or POP considering surgical treatment were invited to participate in the study. After using the PDA and at their next clinic visit, participants completed a DCS to assess their decision-making experience.
Main Outcome Measure
The DCS assessed the level of uncertainty and difficulty participants experienced in deciding on surgical treatment after using the PDA. A DCS score of less than 25 was associated with certainty in implementing the decision.
Results
This was a prospective cohort study of 100 participants. The DCS scores for the cohorts showed low decisional conflict, with median scores of 0.8 (IQR 4.7) for the vault PDA, 6.3 (IQR 25) for the uterine PDA and 7.8 (IQR 21.1) for the SUI PDA. A sub-score analysis revealed higher scores for ‘uncertainty’ and ‘effective decision making’ in 21 participants with total DCS scores above 25.
Conclusion
NICE PDAs are valuable tools for enhancing decision-making in gynaecological surgery. However, this study highlights the need for their ongoing refinement to better address the informational and emotional aspects of patient decision-making. Future research should focus on incorporating emotional support frameworks and psychological management tools to improve their clinical utility and effectiveness.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Keywords: | decisional conflict scale; decision-making; patient decision aid; PDA; stress urinary incontinence; uterine prolapse; vault prolapse |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 05 Aug 2025 08:20 |
Last Modified: | 05 Aug 2025 08:21 |
Status: | Published online |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1111/1471-0528.18311 |
Sustainable Development Goals: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:229985 |