Oliver, P. orcid.org/0000-0002-9665-0635, Huddy, V. orcid.org/0000-0002-0567-8166, McInerney, C. orcid.org/0000-0001-7620-7110 et al. (4 more authors) (2025) Complex mental health difficulties: a mixed methods study in primary care. British Journal of General Practice. BJGP.2024.0818. ISSN: 0960-1643
Abstract
Background Complex Mental Health Difficulties (CMHD) describes long-term difficulties with emotional regulation and relationships, including personality disorders, complex trauma and dysthymia. People with CMHD often experience episodic and crisis-related care. Aim To understand how general practices can better recognise people with CMHDs and provide the best care. Design and Setting A concurrent mixed-methods study was conducted with three components: two qualitative studies and a database study. Methods PPIE People with lived experience of CMHD were consulted throughout the study. Qualitative interviews with GPs and people with CMHD were conducted and transcripts analysed using thematic analysis. Database study A retrospective case-control analysis was conducted using the Connected Bradford database. Integration of results was conducted using ‘following the thread’ and triangulation methods. Results GP interviews: Four overarching themes were identified: (1) The challenges of CMHD; (2) Role expectations; (3) Fragmented communication, fragmented care; (4) Treatment in the primary care context. Lived experience interviews: Four main themes were identified: (1) “How I got here”; (2) Varied care experiences; (3) Traversing mental health services; (4) “Being Seen”. Database study: Approximately 3,040 (0.3% of the database population) records met our criteria for CMHD, suggesting significant under-coding. The most informative feature was the count of unique psychiatric diagnoses. Triangulation: Five meta-themes were identified (i) Complexity of mental health difficulties; (ii) Experience of trauma; (iii) Diagnosis; (iv) Specialist services; and (v) GP services. Conclusion The current organisation of care and lack of an acceptable language for CMHD means that patients’ needs continue to go unrecognised and “unseen"
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2025, The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Published by British Journal of General Practice. For editorial process and policies, see: https://bjgp.org/authors/bjgp-editorial-process-and-policies |
Keywords: | Mental health; Large database research < Research methods; Qualitative research < Research methods |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Science (Sheffield) > Department of Psychology (Sheffield) |
Funding Information: | Funder Grant number DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE NIHR203473 |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 23 Jul 2025 10:36 |
Last Modified: | 23 Jul 2025 10:36 |
Status: | Published online |
Publisher: | Royal College of General Practitioners |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.3399/bjgp.2024.0818 |
Sustainable Development Goals: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:229556 |