Berger, I. orcid.org/0000-0003-3943-6410, Kamble, A., Morton, O. orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-4498 et al. (4 more authors) (2025) Woody vegetation patches in South Indian rice landscapes support tree-affiliated birds but reduce food production, with complex non-linear effects. Landscape Ecology, 40 (7). 145. ISSN 0921-2973
Abstract
Context
Managing agricultural landscapes for sustainability while maintaining high yields is a pressing challenge. Protecting and restoring native or semi-natural vegetation patches is often a core strategy, but its impacts are seldom measured at scales appropriate to understanding yield-biodiversity relationships.
Objectives
In a predominantly rice-growing area of South India, we examined how increasing woody vegetation patch cover impacts (1) harvest- and landscape-level (25 ha) crop yield, (2) densities of birds of different trophic guilds and forest dependencies, and (3) bird community similarity to natural forests.
Methods
We sampled landscapes spanning a continuum of embedded vegetation patch cover. We used statistical weighting to account for confounders and fitted generalised linear and hierarchical Bayesian models, using g-computation to assess the effects of these patches on yield and bird biodiversity.
Results
Vegetation patches reduced harvest-level yield at low cover levels, with landscape-level yield declining more sharply than expected based on patch-occupied area alone. Above ~ 10% cover, harvest-level yield slightly increased, while landscape-level yield remained constant. Pest control-contributing guild densities rose with vegetation cover, above a ~ 10% area threshold. Forest-dependent species responded positively to increasing vegetation cover, while non-forest species showed mixed responses. Similarity to forest bird communities increased with vegetation cover but remained low.
Conclusions
Vegetation patch-free landscapes maximise yield but are of low bird conservation value, and patch covers < 10% entail a yield penalty rather than providing ecosystem-service-related yield benefits, as theory predicts. Increasing vegetation cover from 10 to 20% improves biodiversity with no further yield penalties, suggesting that at least ~ 10% cover may be needed for multifunctional management in this South Indian context.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © The Author(s) 2025. Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
Keywords: | Agroecology; Ecosystem services; Food production; Vegetation patches; Farmland trees; Birds |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Science (Sheffield) > School of Biosciences (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jul 2025 13:16 |
Last Modified: | 14 Jul 2025 13:16 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1007/s10980-025-02136-7 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:229159 |