Naughton-Doe, Ruth Jennifer orcid.org/0000-0003-2683-3476 (Accepted: 2025) Multidisciplinary consensus statement:addressing loneliness experienced by parents in the first 1001 days as a key social determinant of mental health in the UK. BMJ Open. ISSN 2044-6055 (In Press)
Abstract
Objectives: New parents are at increased risk of loneliness, which adversely affects parental and infant health and well-being, and has been linked to increased likelihood of parental mental illness. In the UK, perinatal mental illness is estimated to cost £8.1bn a year, predominantly due to lasting poor health and developmental consequences for children. The purpose of this consensus statement is to determine the state of this research field, highlighting key issues for researchers, policymakers and those responsible for perinatal mental health services and interventions. We will also highlight knowledge gaps to be addressed in future perinatal loneliness research. Design, setting and participants: The Parental Loneliness Research Group held six online meetings between October 2023 and May 2024, attended by academics and practitioners from the UK and USA. Attendees conducted a mapping exercise by appraising published, unpublished, and ongoing perinatal loneliness research. The findings were shared with advisory groups, including parents with lived experience of loneliness. A consensus statement was then drafted, reflecting existing knowledge and gaps in the current evidence about the experience of parental loneliness in the first 1001 days. Results: A consensus about the definitions, measurement, prevalence, antecedents, impacts and interventions relevant to perinatal loneliness is outlined. Gaps in the literature are highlighted. Conclusions: Despite emerging research into perinatal loneliness, it is hard to determine prevalence due to limited analyses of national survey data. Recommendations for future research include secondary data analysis; prioritising equality, diversity and inclusion; reconsidering solutions to perinatal loneliness through a social justice lens; co-producing interventions; and rigorous evaluation of existing interventions.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the University’s Research Publications and Open Access policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of York |
Academic Units: | The University of York > Faculty of Social Sciences (York) > Social Policy and Social Work (York) |
Depositing User: | Pure (York) |
Date Deposited: | 16 Apr 2025 07:40 |
Last Modified: | 16 Apr 2025 07:40 |
Status: | In Press |
Refereed: | Yes |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:225510 |
Download
Filename: 20.03.2025_BMJ_Paper_no_markup.docx
Description: 20.03.2025 BMJ Paper no markup
Licence: CC-BY 2.5
