Murphy, A. orcid.org/0000-0003-3062-0692, Kirby, A., De Blasio, F. et al. (15 more authors) (2025) Cost–benefit analysis of the enhancing men’s awareness of testicular diseases (E-MAT) feasibility trial: a virtual reality experience to increase testicular knowledge and self-examination among male athletes. PharmacoEconomics - Open. ISSN 2509-4262
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is potentially effective in raising awareness of testicular diseases, promoting self-examination and early help-seeking among men. This paper presents an early economic evaluation exploring the potential cost-effectiveness of Enhancing Men's Awareness of Testicular diseases (E-MAT)VR, a VR interactive experience compared with E-MATE, electronic information, among male athletes Results from this economic evaluation will inform and support the design of a future randomized controlled trial (RCT).
METHODS: Results from an Irish feasibility trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05146466) with 74 participants conducted in 2022 were employed. Benefits were measured in monetary units whereby the contingent valuation method was used to elicit participants' preferences through willingness-to-pay measures. A micro-cost analysis estimated the costs of the intervention and comparator and subsequent resource use. The costs and benefits of E-MATVR and E-MATE were compared to determine the net benefit. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
RESULTS: Base case analysis suggests participants were willing to pay €21.88 for E-MATVR and €11.16 for E-MATE. The total cost of E-MATVR was €104.09 and of E-MATE was €22.75 per participant. These estimates include capital and delivery costs, of which delivery costs were €25.02 and €22.40 for E-MATVR and E-MATE, respectively. A negative net benefit indicates E-MATVR was not cost-beneficial as delivered in the feasibility trial. Scenario analyses demonstrated reducing costs via delivery modifications increased the probability of E-MATVR being considered cost-effective. The cost-benefit analysis was feasible, response rates were acceptable, and willingness-to-pay estimates were stable.
CONCLUSIONS: Economic evaluations alongside feasibility trials enable early economic evaluations, informing the design and conduct of a future RCT. E-MATVR had higher expected benefits (WTP) and costs than E-MATE, yielding a negative net benefit. Given the high cost of digital health interventions, investigating their cost-effectiveness early is important to inform and optimize resource allocation decisions. We present a series of scenarios to demonstrate how delivery modifications to reduce costs could improve the likelihood of E-MATVR being considered cost-effective.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > Health Sciences School (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 26 Mar 2025 17:11 |
Last Modified: | 26 Mar 2025 17:11 |
Status: | Published online |
Publisher: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1007/s41669-025-00571-5 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:224903 |